Group Dynamics Ysociometria De Moreno

The desert sand is for the weary traveler as well as continuing the conversation for the lover of silence. In order to understand properly manage group dynamics, especially in the workplace, management can count on the cooperation of the contributions on it bequeaths sociometry. This time we enter the scope, impact and this generates so consider what Wikipedia indicates that the word comes from the terms sociometry Latin socius (being social) and metrum (measure, measure). Sociometry is therefore considered as a measure of social relations among members of a group, meaning that all human group whose elements are known, influence each other and have common goals. This is a more practical level of measuring the number of choices or rejections that an individual receives and its position in the group, but provided no data on the reasons motivating the decisions taken by the subjects in their preferences or rejections. Its initiator was Jacob Levi Moreno, which started its activities in this field in 1925. Dr. Jacob (Jakob) Levi Moreno (b. May 18, 1889 - May 14, 1974) was a leading psychiatrist, theorist and educator.

He is the founder of psychodrama, sociometry and one of the pioneers of Group Psychotherapy Wikipedia reminds us that Moreno was born in 1889 in Bucharest, Romania and grew up in Vienna, Austria. He studied medicine, mathematics and philosophy at the University of Vienna, obtaining his degree in 1917. While still a medical student, rejected Freud's theories and became interested in the potential for therapeutic practice groups. He continued his experimental work (usually children) in psychodrama, sociometry and group psychotherapy after moving to New York, USA in 1925. He held various positions at Columbia University and the New School for Social Research The study defined it as the evolution of groups and the position they occupy in individuals, regardless of the problem of internal structure of each individual.

Taking the scope, impact bequeaths sociometry and their use in organizational behavior. The chair has conducted workshops in this regard to determine the significant role of sociometry in favor of group behavior. The participant Marelys about Ramirez tells us that we can say that contributes sociometry in organizational behavior, and studying the interactions of the group, in every organization there are groups and individuals have come together to achieve particular objectives. Well-structured groups working under the organizational structure, and there are other groups that are not well structured organization and its answer depends on the need to contact the organizations social.es form groups for different reasons which can be for security, status, esteem, affiliation, power and goal achievement. With that comment does not mean that one group is exclusive to companies or organizations. Groups can be formed at any place, whether sports, work, friends, all groups need rules of behavior and especially if they seek to achieve objectives. Wikipedia reminds us that the objectives of sociometry can be listed: 1. Knowing the level of acceptance that a person has in their group.

2. Assess the degree of cohesion among people in a group. 3. Locate the individuals most rejected and most valued (potential leaders). 4. Locating the isolated subjects, do not arouse or admiration or rejection. 5. Check the consequences of adding new people to the group. 6.Verificar the degree of acceptance and inclusion of persons to a new workplace. Notably, as indicated cepcadiz.net / opr /, that Sociometry, Moreno said, would begin to appear as a science from the moment we are able to study social structure as a whole and its parts, at the same time. A social science that deals only for the study of the individual that makes up the group, whether in their relations with the rest of the group about his adjustment to the group, or on any other factor that has departed entirely from himself, not get an adequate picture of social reality. Nor will get a correct view the researcher to study the structure of the group as a whole without looking at the individuals who compose it. Moreno is aware that the separation between person and group is absurd in a psychosocial perspective, the same way that the study of an element of the periodic table chemistry does not tell us anything about the reaction of that item with others in a given mixture .

Moreno attributed therefore to Sociometry capacity to analyze the psychosocial as a unit of analysis with an independent entity. Once the analysis is performed under such a prism, you can see just social relations, which would lead us to collect a series of findings, the latter allowing the researcher to infer the influences of certain parts of the structure at rest. Asique.com. brings about that in order to represent the relationship using the sociogram, which is a technique used to represent the structure sociometers group seeks a group X, ie looking to get graphically ties of influence and preference that exist in it, by observing and contextualizing the different relationships between individuals that make up a group. Such relationships are not necessarily formal, in most cases are informal. It is a tool that dates back fifty years, was created for exploratory purposes and diagnostics, teaching-oriented and work places. Since then paraphrase Moreno (1972), sociometry appears as one of the more advanced strategies and ordered to describe and measure the dynamics of grupos.Adicionalmente, the sociometers also use the sociometric test to measure the relationship of the group.

That way, they can predict how the individual will tend to communicate with other group members. The sociometric test is an instrument used to measure the importance of the organization that appears in social groups, studies the social structures in light of the attractions and rejections manifested within a group. The test has been constructed for the study of family groups, working groups and school groups. This instrument used by sociometer, is to ask the subject to choose, in the group they belong to or which may belong, individuals who want to have as partners, making their choices freely. With these choices or rejections made by the individual of certain people, we can keep an eye on social configurations of a particular group. This instrument has revealed Himself to the underlying psychological structure of a group differs profoundly from its social manifestations, that the structure of a group varies in direct proportion to the age of its members and that the different selection criteria are likely to produce different clusters similar or the same persons (Moreno, 1972).